Apple and the options backdating scandal of the past decade dating web sites that are

17, 2001, through the end of the month, 511 top executives at 186 of these companies got stock option grants. They were worth about 5 million when granted, based on a standard method of valuing stock options.“At Stryker Corp., a Michigan maker of orthopedic products, onetime stock option committee member John Lillard said he didn’t regret the decision to award options nine days after the attack. 20, 2001, at the bottom of a sharp ‘V’ pattern in the share price.“Mr.

The number who received grants was 2.6 times as many as in the same stretch of September in 2000, and more than twice as many as in the like period in any other year between 1999-2003.“Ninety-one companies that didn’t regularly grant stock options in September did so in the first two weeks of trading after the terror attack. ‘If you believe the company is going to do well, and here is an external event that is affecting the market, and you’ve made a decision to reward executives, you go ahead with it,’ Mr. ‘Life goes on.’ …“At Stryker…post-9/11 stock option grants to several executives appear to have been initiated by the chairman and CEO at the time, John W. Brown would ‘periodically tell us if he thought the stock was attractive,’ and then the board would decide whether to award options, said Mr. Besides, he added, no one could have known whether the stock would rebound immediately or continue to slide.“Mr.

In his new research paper, which analyzes options prices and share movements, Dr.

He suspects that it will turn out much worse than what has been exposed in the media thus far (emphasis added): “Erik Lie, a University of Iowa business professor whose work helped fuel regulatory inquiries into backdating, is expected to release fresh research this weekend showing anomalies that suggest a huge cohort of companies may have played games with their options grants.

If the exercise price were

He suspects that it will turn out much worse than what has been exposed in the media thus far (emphasis added): “Erik Lie, a University of Iowa business professor whose work helped fuel regulatory inquiries into backdating, is expected to release fresh research this weekend showing anomalies that suggest a huge cohort of companies may have played games with their options grants.If the exercise price were [[

He suspects that it will turn out much worse than what has been exposed in the media thus far (emphasis added): “Erik Lie, a University of Iowa business professor whose work helped fuel regulatory inquiries into backdating, is expected to release fresh research this weekend showing anomalies that suggest a huge cohort of companies may have played games with their options grants.

If the exercise price were $0, then options would be nothing more than free stock grants, and treated as such in the eyes of recipients.

But the great majority of public companies issue options with an exercise price equal to the market price at the date of grant.

20 to recommend they choose that day to grant options.

He added that he couldn’t remember a time when the board didn’t follow his advice.”So both the CEO and compensation committee are clearly in favor of giving Stryker shareholders as little cash as possible for each option granted to the CEO.

||

He suspects that it will turn out much worse than what has been exposed in the media thus far (emphasis added): “Erik Lie, a University of Iowa business professor whose work helped fuel regulatory inquiries into backdating, is expected to release fresh research this weekend showing anomalies that suggest a huge cohort of companies may have played games with their options grants.If the exercise price were $0, then options would be nothing more than free stock grants, and treated as such in the eyes of recipients.But the great majority of public companies issue options with an exercise price equal to the market price at the date of grant.20 to recommend they choose that day to grant options.He added that he couldn’t remember a time when the board didn’t follow his advice.”So both the CEO and compensation committee are clearly in favor of giving Stryker shareholders as little cash as possible for each option granted to the CEO.

]], then options would be nothing more than free stock grants, and treated as such in the eyes of recipients.But the great majority of public companies issue options with an exercise price equal to the market price at the date of grant.20 to recommend they choose that day to grant options.He added that he couldn’t remember a time when the board didn’t follow his advice.”So both the CEO and compensation committee are clearly in favor of giving Stryker shareholders as little cash as possible for each option granted to the CEO.

, then options would be nothing more than free stock grants, and treated as such in the eyes of recipients.

But the great majority of public companies issue options with an exercise price equal to the market price at the date of grant.

20 to recommend they choose that day to grant options.

He added that he couldn’t remember a time when the board didn’t follow his advice.”So both the CEO and compensation committee are clearly in favor of giving Stryker shareholders as little cash as possible for each option granted to the CEO.

Search for apple and the options backdating scandal of the past decade:

apple and the options backdating scandal of the past decade-52apple and the options backdating scandal of the past decade-72apple and the options backdating scandal of the past decade-17

Simply put, backdating a stock option grant amounts to ripping off shareholders by shortchanging the company treasury.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “apple and the options backdating scandal of the past decade”